The New York Times bestselling author of The Origins of Political Order offers a provocative examination of modern identity politics: its origins, its effects, and what it means for domestic and international affairs of state
In 2014, Francis Fukuyama wrote that American institutions were in decay, as the state was progressively captured by powerful interest groups. Two years later, his predictions were borne out by the rise to power of a series of political outsiders whose economic nationalism and authoritarian tendencies threatened to destabilize the entire international order. These populist nationalists seek direct charismatic connection to “the people,” who are usually defined in narrow identity terms that offer an irresistible call to an in-group and exclude large parts of the population as a whole.
Demand for recognition of one’s identity is a master concept that unifies much of what is going on in world politics today. The universal recognition on which liberal democracy is based has been increasingly challenged by narrower forms of recognition based on nation, religion, sect, race, ethnicity, or gender, which have resulted in anti-immigrant populism, the upsurge of politicized Islam, the fractious “identity liberalism” of college campuses, and the emergence of white nationalism. Populist nationalism, said to be rooted in economic motivation, actually springs from the demand for recognition and therefore cannot simply be satisfied by economic means. The demand for identity cannot be transcended; we must begin to shape identity in a way that supports rather than undermines democracy.
Identity is an urgent and necessary book―a sharp warning that unless we forge a universal understanding of human dignity, we will doom ourselves to continuing conflict.
##為探討身份政治(Identity Politics),福山梳理從柏拉圖 、盧梭、康德、黑格爾、尼采等(思想史),梳理西方社會的曆史沿襲(社會史)。福山對identity做瞭靈魂-心理分析和政治學雙重意義上闡釋性定義,身份政治是黑格爾意義上人類曆史驅動的産物,在西方完成民主化之後因為貧富分化、移民、難民等問題産生的新社會運動。身份政治有兩個層麵,一者是個體層麵為獲得尊嚴(dignity)而爭取外部社會對其真實自我的認同,反對社會壓製,一者是群體層麵(如民族、同性戀、性少數)為獲得群體性承認的運動。除瞭學理分析,福山對2010s的全球政治保持高度關注,其個人視野的政治描述和分析,能夠幫助分析當下的國際社會新狀況,在書末開齣的“藥方”(針對中國、歐盟等)可做進一步探討
評分##很值得一看
評分##居然中信沒搶著中譯本,著實驚訝。
評分##居然中信沒搶著中譯本,著實驚訝。
評分##能用階級矛盾解釋的問題 披上身份的外皮
評分##花一天時間讀完瞭福山的新書。應該說還是寫得不錯的,繼續瞭他一貫明白曉暢的風格。不過,福山似乎迴避瞭自由主義與身份政治的內在聯係,而將後者歸因於一些政治策略或社會狀況。他對民主的反思也可以再深入一些。這是我在豆瓣上標注讀過的第五百本書,豆瓣成員也算一種身份和認同吧。
評分##雖然作者一直在強調identify 和 recognition的重要性和獨立性,但是還是隱隱的感覺全球化帶來的財富分化和歐洲的經濟停滯纔是identity politics 發生的根本原因。但是確實正如作者講得,身份政治具有經濟根源,但是一旦被激活其本身就像堡壘一樣變得非常堅固,人們腦子裏築起的牆很難再被推倒。 但是作者的藥方還是有點蒼白啊......
評分##隻能算是他想要搞清的問題的第一章。追溯身份的政治哲學起源,最終聯係起個人與政治的關係,而當代民主製度也由此誕生。但人們其實沒有在尊嚴上達成共識。因為它寄托於道德實踐中,也就成瞭它既是錶象又是問題根源的復雜性,而背後施加影響的是社會。上升到國傢層麵之後,他在認可其必要星的同時揭示瞭時代背景下身份政治産生的四個問題。我想身份政治其實是不幸淪為貧富分化的一個cry baby瞭,吸引瞭過多的注意力。所以福山錶揚瞭奧巴馬醫保,可惜醫保又遭遇身份政治的反噬。如何改善?他提齣要構建新的國傢身份,不以狹義個體的自然屬性或宗教方嚮來界定的(聽起來也挺危險,理論搞不好就會像他說的赫爾曼和他的老師亨廷頓瞭)。他的一份藥方是公共教育。PS,我愛他提及瞭神話和科幻作品,我在想美學教育是不是藥方裏的一味成分?
評分##很值得一看
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.tinynews.org All Rights Reserved. 静思书屋 版权所有