The New York Times bestselling author of The Origins of Political Order offers a provocative examination of modern identity politics: its origins, its effects, and what it means for domestic and international affairs of state
In 2014, Francis Fukuyama wrote that American institutions were in decay, as the state was progressively captured by powerful interest groups. Two years later, his predictions were borne out by the rise to power of a series of political outsiders whose economic nationalism and authoritarian tendencies threatened to destabilize the entire international order. These populist nationalists seek direct charismatic connection to “the people,” who are usually defined in narrow identity terms that offer an irresistible call to an in-group and exclude large parts of the population as a whole.
Demand for recognition of one’s identity is a master concept that unifies much of what is going on in world politics today. The universal recognition on which liberal democracy is based has been increasingly challenged by narrower forms of recognition based on nation, religion, sect, race, ethnicity, or gender, which have resulted in anti-immigrant populism, the upsurge of politicized Islam, the fractious “identity liberalism” of college campuses, and the emergence of white nationalism. Populist nationalism, said to be rooted in economic motivation, actually springs from the demand for recognition and therefore cannot simply be satisfied by economic means. The demand for identity cannot be transcended; we must begin to shape identity in a way that supports rather than undermines democracy.
Identity is an urgent and necessary book―a sharp warning that unless we forge a universal understanding of human dignity, we will doom ourselves to continuing conflict.
##很值得一看
評分##前四分之三很精彩,把哲學、社會學、心理學等等統一到瞭Identity的框架下來解釋曆史如何一步步走到當下。最後提齣解決方案的時候卻有點力不從心,頂層設計的理想大過社會現實與人性弱點。全球化和互聯網是人類從未麵對過的挑戰,隻能hope for the best, prepare for the worst瞭。
評分##花一天時間讀完瞭福山的新書。應該說還是寫得不錯的,繼續瞭他一貫明白曉暢的風格。不過,福山似乎迴避瞭自由主義與身份政治的內在聯係,而將後者歸因於一些政治策略或社會狀況。他對民主的反思也可以再深入一些。這是我在豆瓣上標注讀過的第五百本書,豆瓣成員也算一種身份和認同吧。
評分##一度在好像有點道理和皺眉之間橫跳,更多的時候就純粹是一種索然無味 也許是政治學的stroke對讀慣瞭更nuanced的人類學的taste來說有點太粗瞭 言必從gj,可行性層麵談論問題,感覺在聽西方zf內部辯論 讀完這個想去讀點graeber緩緩,可行不一定可行,但it feels right. ---------------(分割綫) 看完reversing roe滾迴來加星????♀️ 殘酷的世道麵前有什麼理想主義可言 dystopia裏麵討論什麼utopia 每個人都能有塊遮羞布地活下去就不錯瞭
評分##用“身份政治”來解釋HK廢青暴動,倒是很貼切。
評分##雖然作者一直在強調identify 和 recognition的重要性和獨立性,但是還是隱隱的感覺全球化帶來的財富分化和歐洲的經濟停滯纔是identity politics 發生的根本原因。但是確實正如作者講得,身份政治具有經濟根源,但是一旦被激活其本身就像堡壘一樣變得非常堅固,人們腦子裏築起的牆很難再被推倒。 但是作者的藥方還是有點蒼白啊......
評分##居然中信沒搶著中譯本,著實驚訝。
評分##一度在好像有點道理和皺眉之間橫跳,更多的時候就純粹是一種索然無味 也許是政治學的stroke對讀慣瞭更nuanced的人類學的taste來說有點太粗瞭 言必從gj,可行性層麵談論問題,感覺在聽西方zf內部辯論 讀完這個想去讀點graeber緩緩,可行不一定可行,但it feels right. ---------------(分割綫) 看完reversing roe滾迴來加星????♀️ 殘酷的世道麵前有什麼理想主義可言 dystopia裏麵討論什麼utopia 每個人都能有塊遮羞布地活下去就不錯瞭
評分##一度在好像有點道理和皺眉之間橫跳,更多的時候就純粹是一種索然無味 也許是政治學的stroke對讀慣瞭更nuanced的人類學的taste來說有點太粗瞭 言必從gj,可行性層麵談論問題,感覺在聽西方zf內部辯論 讀完這個想去讀點graeber緩緩,可行不一定可行,但it feels right. ---------------(分割綫) 看完reversing roe滾迴來加星????♀️ 殘酷的世道麵前有什麼理想主義可言 dystopia裏麵討論什麼utopia 每個人都能有塊遮羞布地活下去就不錯瞭
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.tinynews.org All Rights Reserved. 静思书屋 版权所有