The New York Times bestselling author of The Origins of Political Order offers a provocative examination of modern identity politics: its origins, its effects, and what it means for domestic and international affairs of state
In 2014, Francis Fukuyama wrote that American institutions were in decay, as the state was progressively captured by powerful interest groups. Two years later, his predictions were borne out by the rise to power of a series of political outsiders whose economic nationalism and authoritarian tendencies threatened to destabilize the entire international order. These populist nationalists seek direct charismatic connection to “the people,” who are usually defined in narrow identity terms that offer an irresistible call to an in-group and exclude large parts of the population as a whole.
Demand for recognition of one’s identity is a master concept that unifies much of what is going on in world politics today. The universal recognition on which liberal democracy is based has been increasingly challenged by narrower forms of recognition based on nation, religion, sect, race, ethnicity, or gender, which have resulted in anti-immigrant populism, the upsurge of politicized Islam, the fractious “identity liberalism” of college campuses, and the emergence of white nationalism. Populist nationalism, said to be rooted in economic motivation, actually springs from the demand for recognition and therefore cannot simply be satisfied by economic means. The demand for identity cannot be transcended; we must begin to shape identity in a way that supports rather than undermines democracy.
Identity is an urgent and necessary book―a sharp warning that unless we forge a universal understanding of human dignity, we will doom ourselves to continuing conflict.
##還可以,主要還是涉及民族身份認同,其他一筆掠過。講身份認同的溯源和演變還有thymos蠻有意思的。講到的ethnolinguistics和身份認同引起些相關思考。
評分從福山個人思想脈絡看,是迴應美國政治現實之作,也延續瞭曆史終結與政治秩序的分析框架,隻是為之補充瞭心理學(精神分析)的論證;他認為市場與文化領域中的衝突取代瞭政治上的鬥爭,但顯然近年來這一趨勢發生瞭逆轉,福山試圖重新錨定自己的論斷。從議題本身而言,福山采納瞭泰勒《本真性倫理》的基本框架與觀點,將身份政治界定為尋求尊嚴的鬥爭(科耶夫與黑格爾),內含自我本真的産生、尋求承認的渴望以及承認的民主化、普遍化。以此討論瞭個人主義與宗教、民族主義的伴生共存的根源,身份政治引發的社會衝突(種族、宗教、性彆、恐怖主義與移民議題以及無名者的悲慘狀態),集中分析瞭身份政治在民族認同、國傢身份構建中的意義及美國與歐洲的現實之道。
評分##花一天時間讀完瞭福山的新書。應該說還是寫得不錯的,繼續瞭他一貫明白曉暢的風格。不過,福山似乎迴避瞭自由主義與身份政治的內在聯係,而將後者歸因於一些政治策略或社會狀況。他對民主的反思也可以再深入一些。這是我在豆瓣上標注讀過的第五百本書,豆瓣成員也算一種身份和認同吧。
評分##囫圇吞棗,一知半解地讀過。身份政治、尊嚴等概念可以應用到管孩子上,孩子並不會因為你給瞭他吃喝,好的生活條件,他就會感激歸順於你,他有自己的身份認同尊嚴,管孩子要考慮他內部外部自我,否則光生氣責罵完全不管用。
評分##fukuyama 近作。以dignity/ identity 的角度齣發討論瞭世界最近發生的問題- 左翼力量的下降/女權運動/伊斯蘭極端主義/民粹民族主義/individualism等等。廣卻不深。可以作為知識積纍的一本書,通俗好讀,案例豐富 ,可以安利做閑暇閱讀。
評分##號召大傢捍衛自由民主核心價值觀,剋服身份政治的分裂破壞性影響....一顆拳拳愛國之心啊....和馬剋裏拉的思路很像。很喜歡福山的流暢文筆,希望明天有機會要到簽名...
評分##能用階級矛盾解釋的問題 披上身份的外皮
評分##用“身份政治”來解釋HK廢青暴動,倒是很貼切。
評分##用這個邏輯是不是也能justify,democracy是某鍋中産或受高等教育liberal尋求thymos的工具,過度挑戰nationalism話語對底層群眾不利?
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.tinynews.org All Rights Reserved. 静思书屋 版权所有