The New York Times bestselling author of The Origins of Political Order offers a provocative examination of modern identity politics: its origins, its effects, and what it means for domestic and international affairs of state
In 2014, Francis Fukuyama wrote that American institutions were in decay, as the state was progressively captured by powerful interest groups. Two years later, his predictions were borne out by the rise to power of a series of political outsiders whose economic nationalism and authoritarian tendencies threatened to destabilize the entire international order. These populist nationalists seek direct charismatic connection to “the people,” who are usually defined in narrow identity terms that offer an irresistible call to an in-group and exclude large parts of the population as a whole.
Demand for recognition of one’s identity is a master concept that unifies much of what is going on in world politics today. The universal recognition on which liberal democracy is based has been increasingly challenged by narrower forms of recognition based on nation, religion, sect, race, ethnicity, or gender, which have resulted in anti-immigrant populism, the upsurge of politicized Islam, the fractious “identity liberalism” of college campuses, and the emergence of white nationalism. Populist nationalism, said to be rooted in economic motivation, actually springs from the demand for recognition and therefore cannot simply be satisfied by economic means. The demand for identity cannot be transcended; we must begin to shape identity in a way that supports rather than undermines democracy.
Identity is an urgent and necessary book―a sharp warning that unless we forge a universal understanding of human dignity, we will doom ourselves to continuing conflict.
##能用阶级矛盾解释的问题 披上身份的外皮
评分##End of self-esteem = birth of government. 😳 #论节操的自治
评分##一度在好像有点道理和皱眉之间横跳,更多的时候就纯粹是一种索然无味 也许是政治学的stroke对读惯了更nuanced的人类学的taste来说有点太粗了 言必从gj,可行性层面谈论问题,感觉在听西方zf内部辩论 读完这个想去读点graeber缓缓,可行不一定可行,但it feels right. ---------------(分割线) 看完reversing roe滚回来加星🤦♀️ 残酷的世道面前有什么理想主义可言 dystopia里面讨论什么utopia 每个人都能有块遮羞布地活下去就不错了
评分##用“身份政治”来解释HK废青暴动,倒是很贴切。
评分##前四分之三很精彩,把哲学、社会学、心理学等等统一到了Identity的框架下来解释历史如何一步步走到当下。最后提出解决方案的时候却有点力不从心,顶层设计的理想大过社会现实与人性弱点。全球化和互联网是人类从未面对过的挑战,只能hope for the best, prepare for the worst了。
评分##前四分之三很精彩,把哲学、社会学、心理学等等统一到了Identity的框架下来解释历史如何一步步走到当下。最后提出解决方案的时候却有点力不从心,顶层设计的理想大过社会现实与人性弱点。全球化和互联网是人类从未面对过的挑战,只能hope for the best, prepare for the worst了。
评分##当今左派的问题是从多元滑向相对,从而使得身份政治更加碎片化,丧失沟通、团结右翼底层的能力;右翼的问题是民粹化严重,民族(几乎是白人种族主义)和宗教被政治野心家利用,使得共和党被茶党填塞,建制派几乎丧失议政能力。加之社交网络加剧的撕裂,维系民主政治稳定性的中左、中右势力几乎被摧毁。福山在最后试图提出以普世价值的信条来重塑天然、偶在的“身份”,并在民族身份上着墨甚多,想通过同化移民来解决民族身份认同的问题,甚至在欧盟和美国提出了一些具体的移民政策。这种倡议或许只是超国家层面的一厢情愿,但对于如何系统性地解决一国内国的问题,如美国的右翼民粹承受的经济、社会、文化的整体性失落,福山的回应潦草而简略“缓解其对工作、收入、安全的担忧”,但正如他所承认的那样,右翼民粹的身份认同并不完全是经济驱动的。
评分##居然中信没抢着中译本,着实惊讶。
评分##居然中信没抢着中译本,着实惊讶。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.tinynews.org All Rights Reserved. 静思书屋 版权所有