具體描述
On the eve of International Women’s Day in 2015, the Chinese government arrested five feminist activists and jailed them for thirty-seven days. The Feminist Five became a global cause célèbre, with Hillary Clinton speaking out on their behalf and activists inundating social media with #FreetheFive messages. But the Five are only symbols of a much larger feminist movement of civil rights lawyers, labor activists, performance artists, and online warriors prompting an unprecedented awakening among China’s educated, urban women. In Betraying Big Brother, journalist and scholar Leta Hong Fincher argues that the popular, broad-based movement poses the greatest challenge to China’s authoritarian regime today.
Through interviews with the Feminist Five and other leading Chinese activists, Hong Fincher illuminates both the difficulties they face and their “joy of betraying Big Brother,” as one of the Feminist Five wrote of the defiance she felt during her detention. Tracing the rise of a new feminist consciousness now finding expression through the #MeToo movement, and describing how the Communist regime has suppressed the history of its own feminist struggles, Betraying Big Brother is a story of how the movement against patriarchy could reconfigure China and the world.
用戶評價
##評論說得對，確實是在很主觀（很外賓）地講故事完全不學術，並沒有看到想要看到的深刻分析……（倒是突然意識到這個話題確實很敏感處境確實很嚴峻……
評分##很尷尬的寫法...算紀實感覺作者本人感情過於豐沛，算學術嚮又沒啥分析....敘事也七上八下的，經常蹦一句前不著村後不著店....就是可能在綫索有限的條件下梳理瞭近年社運的題材不容易，給一顆感情星.....
評分##非常極其一般。可以肯定的是記錄瞭近幾年年輕一代特彆是五姐妹的運動細節。但是到瞭介紹曆史背景深入論述的部分，基本就是大型文獻綜述，語言讀起來非常不順，作者自己的知識貢獻很有限
評分作者的觀點是：父權是極權統治的重要手段，麵對現在全世界的極權傾嚮，支持女權是最有效的應對手段。說實話一開始我是懷疑態度。也許作者研究女權所以把它看得過於重要？xxx肯定沒有把女性看得重要到要當作重要打擊對象吧？以對抗極權為目的呼籲大傢支持女權是不是騙人的？但是看完書我被完全說服瞭。如果你和我一樣對現在的新聞感到驚訝和睏惑（殺妻輕判；傢暴不立案；重新鼓吹男尊女卑三從四德這些以前被說是封建落後的東西；人口危機鼓勵生育卻仍然不允許單身女性生育；發反行騷擾貼紙的人要抓起來……等等），那麼不要懷疑瞭，解釋隻有一個：比起生育什麼的，更重要的是父權，因為那是極權的基石。另外書裏還從曆史的角度揭示瞭從國民黨到xxx，女權都是被利用的。男革命傢不太可能真的同情女權。奪取權力的時候利用女權，分配權利時輪不到女性
評分##2.5/5 Fincher would benefit if she bothered to hire a few editors for advice, because her writing appears tediously dry and repetitive, often without delving deeper into the 'history side' of the issue, not to mention that the feminism discussed in this book seems somewhat naive and strategically flawed in excluding men from the conversation.
評分##說是中國女權主義的覺醒，然而通篇講來講去就是五姐妹。敘事翻來覆去，重復囉嗦，個人感情色彩太濃，有損閱讀體驗，章節之間關係不強，理論論證站不住腳，精衛填海和鞦瑾的故事聯係太牽強，數據來源也模模糊糊。除瞭五姐妹的采訪，和人民日報的幾篇文章，作者似乎沒有任何其他個人貢獻瞭。
評分##非常失望
評分##2.5/5 Fincher would benefit if she bothered to hire a few editors for advice, because her writing appears tediously dry and repetitive, often without delving deeper into the 'history side' of the issue, not to mention that the feminism discussed in this book seems somewhat naive and strategically flawed in excluding men from the conversation.
評分##不說書。作者在推上節奏帶得飛起，容不得彆人半點質疑，動不動就號召follower舉報質疑者，亂扣帽子。整個一惡霸。種種跡象錶明是個輪子。
相關圖書
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.tinynews.org All Rights Reserved. 静思书屋 版权所有