具体描述
On the eve of International Women’s Day in 2015, the Chinese government arrested five feminist activists and jailed them for thirty-seven days. The Feminist Five became a global cause célèbre, with Hillary Clinton speaking out on their behalf and activists inundating social media with #FreetheFive messages. But the Five are only symbols of a much larger feminist movement of civil rights lawyers, labor activists, performance artists, and online warriors prompting an unprecedented awakening among China’s educated, urban women. In Betraying Big Brother, journalist and scholar Leta Hong Fincher argues that the popular, broad-based movement poses the greatest challenge to China’s authoritarian regime today.
Through interviews with the Feminist Five and other leading Chinese activists, Hong Fincher illuminates both the difficulties they face and their “joy of betraying Big Brother,” as one of the Feminist Five wrote of the defiance she felt during her detention. Tracing the rise of a new feminist consciousness now finding expression through the #MeToo movement, and describing how the Communist regime has suppressed the history of its own feminist struggles, Betraying Big Brother is a story of how the movement against patriarchy could reconfigure China and the world.
用户评价
##不说书。作者在推上节奏带得飞起，容不得别人半点质疑，动不动就号召follower举报质疑者，乱扣帽子。整个一恶霸。种种迹象表明是个轮子。
评分##非常失望
评分##洪理达真的literally打破了我对斯坦福的学术训练能力的幻想，两本书两个极端，但是一致的烂。leftover那本书不加论证地发表了一堆骇人听闻的言论，这本书1-7章全纪实讲故事，没有一丁点理论建构或是分析，讲的还基本是翻微信公众号都差不多能知道的故事，narrative也不咋地。我看斯坦福不行。
评分##2.5/5 Fincher would benefit if she bothered to hire a few editors for advice, because her writing appears tediously dry and repetitive, often without delving deeper into the 'history side' of the issue, not to mention that the feminism discussed in this book seems somewhat naive and strategically flawed in excluding men from the conversation.
评分##2.5/5 Fincher would benefit if she bothered to hire a few editors for advice, because her writing appears tediously dry and repetitive, often without delving deeper into the 'history side' of the issue, not to mention that the feminism discussed in this book seems somewhat naive and strategically flawed in excluding men from the conversation.
评分##评论说得对，确实是在很主观（很外宾）地讲故事完全不学术，并没有看到想要看到的深刻分析……（倒是突然意识到这个话题确实很敏感处境确实很严峻……
评分##Her narrative lacks a natural flow, and the book feels choppy. And she obviously has ill feelings toward China. That said, it's a necessary read.
评分##洪理达真的literally打破了我对斯坦福的学术训练能力的幻想，两本书两个极端，但是一致的烂。leftover那本书不加论证地发表了一堆骇人听闻的言论，这本书1-7章全纪实讲故事，没有一丁点理论建构或是分析，讲的还基本是翻微信公众号都差不多能知道的故事，narrative也不咋地。我看斯坦福不行。
评分##某些单方面决定以评价学术专著的标准来鸡蛋里挑骨头的用户，实际上是无事找茬，暴露了基于立场和偏见而非基于事实和公正的马脚
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.tinynews.org All Rights Reserved. 静思书屋 版权所有