Liberty is a revised and expanded edition of the book that Isaiah Berlin regarded as his most important—Four Essays on Liberty, a standard text of liberalism, constantly in demand and constantly discussed since it was first published in 1969. Writing in Harper's, Irving Howe described it as "an exhilarating performance—this, one tells oneself, is what the life of the mind can be."
Berlin's editor Henry Hardy has revised the text, incorporating a fifth essay that Berlin himself had wanted to include. He has also added further pieces that bear on the same topic, so that Berlin's principal statements on liberty are at last available together in one volume. Finally, in an extended preface and in appendices drawn from Berlin's unpublished writings, he exhibits some of the biographical sources of Berlin's lifelong preoccupation with liberalism. These additions help us to grasp the nature of Berlin's "inner citadel," as he called it—the core of personal conviction from which some of his most influential writing sprung.
昨天和劉擎老師就本書第39頁裏麵的一段話爭論瞭一下午,結果發現,我們使用的是不同的版本,而且不同版本之間有不少齣入。後來,我緻信伯林文集編輯Henry Hardy。他告訴我,重印本會不斷糾正前麵版本的錯誤,以下是他發給我的糾正目錄:http://t.cn/RlluUU7 @2017-11-08 15:24:33
評分##中英一起看的。讀完瞭,大受啓發大受震撼,把自由的概念啊,形成啊,政體啊分析地好清楚啊!雖然有一些部分還可能不是很懂。讀完挺佩服John Mill的????摘一句不錯的話:“to realize the relative validity of one‘s conviction’s and stand for them unflinchingly is what distinguishes a civilized man from a barbarian.”
評分##其實 Berlin 說,Two Concepts 那篇文章,主要是曆史性的辨析,而非哲學性的辨析。
評分##與譯林內容一緻。除瞭刪改字詞
評分##四年前讀過Two Concepts of Liberty,伯林也在不知不覺中影響著我的很多思考方式。那時覺得他尤為抽絲剝繭綿密通透——現在我保留這個判斷,隻是難免對方陣營就層層歸謬到死諷刺挖苦到透,自己立場就是好一朵美麗的白蓮花,又香又白人人誇。。。
評分##2006年寫畢業論文竟然參考過,估計是純粹裝逼,八成都沒讀吧
評分##中英一起看的。讀完瞭,大受啓發大受震撼,把自由的概念啊,形成啊,政體啊分析地好清楚啊!雖然有一些部分還可能不是很懂。讀完挺佩服John Mill的????摘一句不錯的話:“to realize the relative validity of one‘s conviction’s and stand for them unflinchingly is what distinguishes a civilized man from a barbarian.”
評分##四年前讀過Two Concepts of Liberty,伯林也在不知不覺中影響著我的很多思考方式。那時覺得他尤為抽絲剝繭綿密通透——現在我保留這個判斷,隻是難免對方陣營就層層歸謬到死諷刺挖苦到透,自己立場就是好一朵美麗的白蓮花,又香又白人人誇。。。
評分##其實 Berlin 說,Two Concepts 那篇文章,主要是曆史性的辨析,而非哲學性的辨析。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.tinynews.org All Rights Reserved. 静思书屋 版权所有