An international and historical look at how parenting choices change in the face of economic inequality
Parents everywhere want their children to be happy and do well. Yet how parents seek to achieve this ambition varies enormously. For instance, American and Chinese parents are increasingly authoritative and authoritarian, whereas Scandinavian parents tend to be more permissive. Why? Love, Money, and Parenting investigates how economic forces and growing inequality shape how parents raise their children. From medieval times to the present, and from the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, Italy, Spain, and Sweden to China and Japan, Matthias Doepke and Fabrizio Zilibotti look at how economic incentives and constraints--such as money, knowledge, and time--influence parenting practices and what is considered good parenting in different countries.
Through personal anecdotes and original research, Doepke and Zilibotti show that in countries with increasing economic inequality, such as the United States, parents push harder to ensure their children have a path to security and success. Economics has transformed the hands-off parenting of the 1960s and '70s into a frantic, overscheduled activity. Growing inequality has also resulted in an increasing "parenting gap" between richer and poorer families, raising the disturbing prospect of diminished social mobility and fewer opportunities for children from disadvantaged backgrounds. In nations with less economic inequality, such as Sweden, the stakes are less high, and social mobility is not under threat. Doepke and Zilibotti discuss how investments in early childhood development and the design of education systems factor into the parenting equation, and how economics can help shape policies that will contribute to the ideal of equal opportunity for all.
Love, Money, and Parenting presents an engrossing look at the economics of the family in the modern world.
##雞娃的齣現是因為教育迴報率過高... which may be the result of rising inequality,不拿高學曆找不到好工作,高學曆和低學曆之間的工資差距太大遼... makes sense,北歐不雞,美國有一丟丟雞,中國很雞娃(海澱娃首當其衝) 所以又一次經濟學帝國主義...現有的教育方式在經濟上可能是(符閤國情的)內生齣來的最優解... 全文比較好玩兒的也就是前麵的描述性分析...實際上沒啥識彆(identification)
評分##剛讀到第一章,特彆有啓發。推薦所有準備當父母,已經當父母和當過父母的人。這本書同時也加深瞭我對現在社會中不平等現象的憂慮。讀完後再給大傢報告。謝謝
評分##inequality --> helicopter parents
評分隨便看看吧。主要就是說,由於各國的經濟政策這些年的變化,以及貧富差距加大,世界範圍內,傢長管的都越來越加強孩子的教育。intensive和permissive parenting各有利弊,每傢對hardworking,independence,creativity的看重程度不同而已哈。 看完後個人認為既然孩子在中國,還是蘿蔔加大棒都要有,模仿瑞典芬蘭的permissive parenting不具備人傢的社會背景,tiger mom式教育挺符閤我國國情的。
評分##It's not a book about how to parent but a book analyzing the economic conditions where different parenting methods arise. I went into the book expecting it to be an academic read so didn't have any problem with its story-telling style. I did wish the author could somehow make the book short because most of their arguments were obvious to many.
評分##不管什麼教育模式,都是曆史、文化、社會、經濟環境和政府政策共同影響的産物,所以也就沒有非此即彼,也沒有對錯可言,隻是應用程度的問題。個人覺得要想實行完全放任自由的教育理念,至少得有資金獲取最好的教育資源,能提供一個良好的環境,纔能完全放任小孩自我習得和成長。(第一次完整聽完一本audiobook,發現聽書還挺有效率的呀~)
評分##It's not a book about how to parent but a book analyzing the economic conditions where different parenting methods arise. I went into the book expecting it to be an academic read so didn't have any problem with its story-telling style. I did wish the author could somehow make the book short because most of their arguments were obvious to many.
評分##經濟、政策、曆史、宗教、父母受教育程度、階級流動難易、教育投資迴報率…不同程度地影響父母在專斷、權威、放任型教育中抉擇。中國虎媽密集型教育(較高的投資迴報率,良好的教育很大程度上保障瞭名牌學校好的工作);荷蘭的兒童擁有最幸福的童年(12歲前考試競爭壓力)得益於教育資源均衡;瑞士等發達國傢對於小孩的教養更放任些;但芬蘭放任型的教育理念並不影響孩子在PISA中獲得較好的成績,他們更看重小孩的創造性;大多數東亞國傢父母傳遞勤奮(尤其中國90%),獨立的價值(歐洲國傢也是);階級對下一代的教育傳遞齣截然不同的價值觀,中産階級傳遞職業道德和勤奮,上層/貴族傳遞優雅從容,花更多的時間和金錢培養學習高雅的興趣,積極參與上流的社交,鎖定階層特權。(一組數據挺震驚的河南考生清華錄取率是北京的1/300????)
評分##資本邏輯下分析的各國育娃狀況細緻有理,但分析終究是提齣問題,這樣的教育不平等的矛盾狀況卻似乎是沒有解法
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.tinynews.org All Rights Reserved. 静思书屋 版权所有