An international and historical look at how parenting choices change in the face of economic inequality
Parents everywhere want their children to be happy and do well. Yet how parents seek to achieve this ambition varies enormously. For instance, American and Chinese parents are increasingly authoritative and authoritarian, whereas Scandinavian parents tend to be more permissive. Why? Love, Money, and Parenting investigates how economic forces and growing inequality shape how parents raise their children. From medieval times to the present, and from the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, Italy, Spain, and Sweden to China and Japan, Matthias Doepke and Fabrizio Zilibotti look at how economic incentives and constraints--such as money, knowledge, and time--influence parenting practices and what is considered good parenting in different countries.
Through personal anecdotes and original research, Doepke and Zilibotti show that in countries with increasing economic inequality, such as the United States, parents push harder to ensure their children have a path to security and success. Economics has transformed the hands-off parenting of the 1960s and '70s into a frantic, overscheduled activity. Growing inequality has also resulted in an increasing "parenting gap" between richer and poorer families, raising the disturbing prospect of diminished social mobility and fewer opportunities for children from disadvantaged backgrounds. In nations with less economic inequality, such as Sweden, the stakes are less high, and social mobility is not under threat. Doepke and Zilibotti discuss how investments in early childhood development and the design of education systems factor into the parenting equation, and how economics can help shape policies that will contribute to the ideal of equal opportunity for all.
Love, Money, and Parenting presents an engrossing look at the economics of the family in the modern world.
##不管什麼教育模式,都是曆史、文化、社會、經濟環境和政府政策共同影響的産物,所以也就沒有非此即彼,也沒有對錯可言,隻是應用程度的問題。個人覺得要想實行完全放任自由的教育理念,至少得有資金獲取最好的教育資源,能提供一個良好的環境,纔能完全放任小孩自我習得和成長。(第一次完整聽完一本audiobook,發現聽書還挺有效率的呀~)
評分##Solid research
評分##經濟學的視角梳理瞭育兒觀念,生育意願的曆史變遷。這些看似主觀的決定,也脫不瞭所處的時代背景。也不免讓人好奇:作為個體,是順應時代的大多數還是依從自己意願對子女更好呢?
評分##經濟學的視角梳理瞭育兒觀念,生育意願的曆史變遷。這些看似主觀的決定,也脫不瞭所處的時代背景。也不免讓人好奇:作為個體,是順應時代的大多數還是依從自己意願對子女更好呢?
評分##inequality --> helicopter parents
評分##喜歡這本書。經濟學傢的背景婉婉道來美國,歐洲(北歐,西班牙,法國,意大利)和東亞(日本,中國)不同的社會環境造成瞭不同的父母(專製型,說教型和隨波逐流型)。裏麵還有大量的數據實證分析。準備買一本收藏之。
評分##剛讀到第一章,特彆有啓發。推薦所有準備當父母,已經當父母和當過父母的人。這本書同時也加深瞭我對現在社會中不平等現象的憂慮。讀完後再給大傢報告。謝謝
評分##資本邏輯下分析的各國育娃狀況細緻有理,但分析終究是提齣問題,這樣的教育不平等的矛盾狀況卻似乎是沒有解法
評分##雞娃的齣現是因為教育迴報率過高... which may be the result of rising inequality,不拿高學曆找不到好工作,高學曆和低學曆之間的工資差距太大遼... makes sense,北歐不雞,美國有一丟丟雞,中國很雞娃(海澱娃首當其衝) 所以又一次經濟學帝國主義...現有的教育方式在經濟上可能是(符閤國情的)內生齣來的最優解... 全文比較好玩兒的也就是前麵的描述性分析...實際上沒啥識彆(identification)
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.tinynews.org All Rights Reserved. 静思书屋 版权所有