A revolutionary new argument from eminent Yale Law professor Daniel Markovits attacking the false promise of meritocracy It is an axiom of American life that advantage should be earned through ability and effort. Even as the country divides itself at every turn, the meritocratic ideal - that social and economic rewards should follow achievement rather than breeding - reigns supreme. Both Democrats and Republicans insistently repeat meritocratic notions. Meritocracy cuts to the heart of who we are. It sustains the American dream. But what if, both up and down the social ladder, meritocracy is a sham? Today, meritocracy has become exactly what it was conceived to resist: a mechanism for the concentration and dynastic transmission of wealth and privilege across generations. Upward mobility has become a fantasy, and the embattled middle classes are now more likely to sink into the working poor than to rise into the professional elite. At the same time, meritocracy now ensnares even those who manage to claw their way to the top, requiring rich adults to work with crushing intensity, exploiting their expensive educations in order to extract a return. All this is not the result of deviations or retreats from meritocracy but rather stems directly from meritocracy's successes. This is the radical argument that Daniel Markovits prosecutes with rare force. Markovits is well placed to expose the sham of meritocracy. Having spent his life at elite universities, he knows from the inside the corrosive system we are trapped within. Markovits also knows that, if we understand that meritocratic inequality produces near-universal harm, we can cure it. When The Meritocracy Trap reveals the inner workings of the meritocratic machine, it also illuminates the first steps outward, towards a new world that might once again afford dignity and prosperity to the American people.
##對一個發現印象很深:金領為瞭維持地位而瘋狂工作,積纍瞭大量財富卻無法享受生活,因此而感到不幸福;中産工作的時間減少收入也減少,有瞭大量的時間卻難以提高社會階層/經濟收入,也不幸福。這個世界啊。
評分##頁麵下很多評論都指齣瞭這本書的問題:羅列瞭很多事實但是完全沒有一點有深度的分析。6分是很閤適的評價。
評分##沒有新的論據。政策建議看p.277上兩句話寫清楚的就行瞭。
評分##不就是捲嘛,居然能說這麼多……
評分##批判這件事 還是我圈更在行 要不然結尾都是宣言絕句呢
評分##稍微讀點書,還是能長見識的。 中國目前就是麵臨這樣的一個局麵,業內捲,孩子雞,結婚率低,社會不穩定,競爭越發劇烈。與其說勤勞一直是中國人的本色,但是逃離北上廣變成瞭一種現象。
評分##the conjecture looks a bit fresh, but the elaborations and arguments could have been way more precise, smooth, and succinct. There are many drawbacks described, but may not due to meritocracy. The proposed fixes, are probably doomed to fail or abused...Many of the arguments boil down to one question: would there ever be a real equality?
評分##也許有知識社會學的讀法:What is conventionally called merit is actually an ideological conceit, constructed to launder a fundamentally unjust allocation of advantage. 作者分析瞭精英化對學術場域的影響,很貼近我的感受,之前也看到推上幾個經濟學教授在爭論。
評分##最後的建議帶有學者的天真。例子很多,但也有點囉嗦。不管怎麼說,是時候討論meritocracy的問題瞭,為這個加半星。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.tinynews.org All Rights Reserved. 静思书屋 版权所有