A revolutionary new argument from eminent Yale Law professor Daniel Markovits attacking the false promise of meritocracy It is an axiom of American life that advantage should be earned through ability and effort. Even as the country divides itself at every turn, the meritocratic ideal - that social and economic rewards should follow achievement rather than breeding - reigns supreme. Both Democrats and Republicans insistently repeat meritocratic notions. Meritocracy cuts to the heart of who we are. It sustains the American dream. But what if, both up and down the social ladder, meritocracy is a sham? Today, meritocracy has become exactly what it was conceived to resist: a mechanism for the concentration and dynastic transmission of wealth and privilege across generations. Upward mobility has become a fantasy, and the embattled middle classes are now more likely to sink into the working poor than to rise into the professional elite. At the same time, meritocracy now ensnares even those who manage to claw their way to the top, requiring rich adults to work with crushing intensity, exploiting their expensive educations in order to extract a return. All this is not the result of deviations or retreats from meritocracy but rather stems directly from meritocracy's successes. This is the radical argument that Daniel Markovits prosecutes with rare force. Markovits is well placed to expose the sham of meritocracy. Having spent his life at elite universities, he knows from the inside the corrosive system we are trapped within. Markovits also knows that, if we understand that meritocratic inequality produces near-universal harm, we can cure it. When The Meritocracy Trap reveals the inner workings of the meritocratic machine, it also illuminates the first steps outward, towards a new world that might once again afford dignity and prosperity to the American people.
##时不时会有一本书,让我觉得把头脑里一直以来模糊的想法梳理清楚,片段的观念串珠成线,这本书就是这样的。“择优录取”表面看来是如此正确、先进、优良、公平的一个制度,但深挖下去,和很多东西一样,藏着各种黑洞。不,我并不认为我们需要打倒择优这件事——比起很多其他的制度,它依然是远远领先的,但是,意识到一件事情不那么“理所当然”,看到隐藏在褶皱里被人忽视的裂缝,以及这些裂缝里的人,和他们的挣扎,是任何社会、和制度前进的条件。另外一个有醍醐灌顶效果的是书里提到,既得利益阶级和他们的后代,同样是这种制度的受害者,就像剑齿虎夸张的獠牙已经偏离了进化的优势,却成为沉重的负担一样。所以在个人层面上,我在听这本书时想得最多的一句话就是,我不打算成为这个择优游戏的牺牲品,我也不会让我的孩子成为牺牲品。
评分##阿姨送我的书,她女儿头脑聪慧但体弱多病她很忧心,给我讲一些怪事比某州某校某年掩盖了N个学生自杀。我感觉现在美国高中也这样吧中国教育大省的高中每年都挂几个的。我认识的叔叔当校长受不了不干了。下午抓起来翻了一遍..作者慷慨陈词,类似hypereducated/superelite的大词简直吓死本韭了。他的观察和论据都非常实在-workplace training以前是雇主提供如今成本转嫁给了员工。但我觉得整本书忽视了了一个大的矛盾,即生产力与生产关系的矛盾,人力不值钱,制造合格劳动力的养育成本太高,更不用说医生律师等。养孩假设按照每年20W成本,复利10%20年后总成本1145W;换做15%复利总成本就变成2048W了..啥样的工作能justify这种投入啊?那可不就形成了一个trap..
评分##也许有知识社会学的读法:What is conventionally called merit is actually an ideological conceit, constructed to launder a fundamentally unjust allocation of advantage. 作者分析了精英化对学术场域的影响,很贴近我的感受,之前也看到推上几个经济学教授在争论。
评分##最后的建议带有学者的天真。例子很多,但也有点啰嗦。不管怎么说,是时候讨论meritocracy的问题了,为这个加半星。
评分##批判这件事 还是我圈更在行 要不然结尾都是宣言绝句呢
评分##浏览了下,想法不新颖,然后法律系教授分析东西还是表面。建议多看看社会学对Merit的系统性批判。。。
评分##没有新的论据。政策建议看p.277上两句话写清楚的就行了。
评分##The overconfident elite & a group of depressed ppl tried in vain to alleviate the inequality caused by the system. The continued embrace of financial products and debt-backed consumption for decades finally triggered the financial turmoil & the Great Recession. This conclusion is unbelievably stupid
评分##没有新的论据。政策建议看p.277上两句话写清楚的就行了。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.tinynews.org All Rights Reserved. 静思书屋 版权所有