An inkstone, a piece of polished stone no bigger than an outstretched hand, is an instrument for grinding ink, a collectible object of art, a token of exchange between friends or sovereign states, and an inscriptional surface on which texts and images are carved and reproduced. As such the inkstone is entangled with the production of elite masculinity and the culture of wen (culture, literature, civility) in China, Korea, and Japan for over a millennium. Curiously, this ubiquitous object in East Asia is virtually unknown in Europe and America.
The Social Life of Inkstones introduces its hidden history and cultural significance to scholars and collectors and in so doing, writes the stonecutters and artisans into history. Each of the five chapters is set in a specific place in disparate parts of the empire: the imperial workshops in the Forbidden City, the Duan quarries in Guangdong, inkstonecarving workshops in Suzhou and elsewhere in the south, and collectors’ homes in Fujian. Taken together, they trace the trajectories of the inkstone between court and society, and through the course of its entire social life. In bringing to life the people involved in making, using, collecting, and writing about the inkstone, this study shows the powerful emotional and technical investments that such a small object engendered.
This first book-length study of inkstones focuses on a group of inkstone carvers and collectors, highlighting the work of Gu Erniang, a woman transitioned the artistry of inkstone-making to modernity between the 1680s and 1730s. The sophistication of these artisans and the craft practice of the scholars associated with them announced a new social order in which the age-old hierarchy of head over hand no longer predominated.
##中文版怎麼能這麼貴!
評分##這本書的最具啓發的不在於“士人(式)工匠”和“士人(式)學者”在認知論層麵上的衝突和競爭或其隱約指嚮的清代思想史轉型,而是通過在本體論層麵上將“知識”作為一個分析類彆批判性地解/構,曆史學傢得以藉由新的認知論——無論是曆史的還是當代的——迴應一些已經被規範化的“傳統”史學問題,其中自然包括如何處理書中徵引的零碎史料。當然這些事人類學傢早都說過瞭……至於書本身,不是教職書的寫法或曰心態,很難不寫得舒緩從容。
評分##🙇🏻♀️
評分##希望快齣中文版
評分##鬆花石 vs 端石
評分##某大佬評價此書unfinished哈哈哈
評分##這本書的最具啓發的不在於“士人(式)工匠”和“士人(式)學者”在認知論層麵上的衝突和競爭或其隱約指嚮的清代思想史轉型,而是通過在本體論層麵上將“知識”作為一個分析類彆批判性地解/構,曆史學傢得以藉由新的認知論——無論是曆史的還是當代的——迴應一些已經被規範化的“傳統”史學問題,其中自然包括如何處理書中徵引的零碎史料。當然這些事人類學傢早都說過瞭……至於書本身,不是教職書的寫法或曰心態,很難不寫得舒緩從容。
評分中文譯本埋頭苦幹中,並將由原作者高彥頤親自操刀修訂,敬請期待!
評分##🙇🏻♀️
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.tinynews.org All Rights Reserved. 静思书屋 版权所有