Hsiao-t’i Li is Professor in the Department of Chinese and History at the City University of Hong Kong.
Popular operas in late imperial China were a major part of daily entertainment, and were also important for transmitting knowledge of Chinese culture and values. In the twentieth century, however, Chinese operas went through significant changes. During the first four decades of the 1900s, led by Xin Wutai (New Stage) of Shanghai and Yisushe of Xi’an, theaters all over China experimented with both stage and scripts to present bold new plays centering on social reform. Operas became closely intertwined with social and political issues. This trend toward “politicization” was to become the most dominant theme of Chinese opera from the 1930s to the 1970s, when ideology-laden political plays reflected a radical revolutionary agenda.
Drawing upon a rich array of primary sources, this book focuses on the reformed operas staged in Shanghai and Xi’an. By presenting extensive information on both traditional/imperial China and revolutionary/Communist China, it reveals the implications of these “modern” operatic experiences and the changing features of Chinese operas throughout the past five centuries. Although the different genres of opera were watched by audiences from all walks of life, the foundations for opera’s omnipresence completely changed over time.
##這本書其實是在李孝悌1996年博士論文的基礎上改寫的,這本書與他的《清末的下層社會啓濛運動》和《明清以降的宗教城市與啓濛》在意旨上真是一脈相承。其中有一章寫到瞭西安易俗社的戲麯改革。
評分 評分額有點迷...
評分##這本書其實是在李孝悌1996年博士論文的基礎上改寫的,這本書與他的《清末的下層社會啓濛運動》和《明清以降的宗教城市與啓濛》在意旨上真是一脈相承。其中有一章寫到瞭西安易俗社的戲麯改革。
評分 評分##這本書其實是在李孝悌1996年博士論文的基礎上改寫的,這本書與他的《清末的下層社會啓濛運動》和《明清以降的宗教城市與啓濛》在意旨上真是一脈相承。其中有一章寫到瞭西安易俗社的戲麯改革。
評分##這本書其實是在李孝悌1996年博士論文的基礎上改寫的,這本書與他的《清末的下層社會啓濛運動》和《明清以降的宗教城市與啓濛》在意旨上真是一脈相承。其中有一章寫到瞭西安易俗社的戲麯改革。
評分##typical 李孝悌;argument上很大程度上是對清末民初啓濛一書的擴展
評分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.tinynews.org All Rights Reserved. 静思书屋 版权所有