具体描述
n finite games, like football or chess, the players are known, the rules are fixed, and the endpoint is clear. The winners and losers are easily identified.
In infinite games, like business or politics or life itself, the players come and go, the rules are changeable, and there is no defined endpoint. There are no winners or losers in an infinite game; there is only ahead and behind.
The more I started to understand the difference between finite and infinite games, the more I began to see infinite games all around us. I started to see that many of the struggles that organizations face exist simply because their leaders were playing with a finite mindset in an infinite game. These organizations tend to lag behind in innovation, discretionary effort, morale and ultimately performance.
The leaders who embrace an infinite mindset, in stark contrast, build stronger, more innovative, more inspiring organizations. Their people trust each other and their leaders. They have the resilience to thrive in an ever-changing world, while their competitors fall by the wayside. Ultimately, they are the ones who lead the rest of us into the future.
Any worthwhile undertaking starts with Why – the purpose, cause or belief that inspires us to do what we do and inspires others to join us. Good leaders know how to build Circles of Safety that promote trust and cooperation throughout their organizations. But that’s not enough to help us chart a course through the unpredictable, often chaotic landscape of today’s marketplace.
I now believe that the ability to adopt an infinite mindset is a prerequisite for any leader who aspires to leave their organization in better shape than they found it.Age Range: Adult
用户评价
##公司townhall听到有人提这本书 好奇看完了 理念是好的 long term view, just cause, do the right thing怎么说都是对的 大公司里挑出来好例子做proof也不难 但mkt看重的performance efficiency 不是所有公司都有一样的机会convince wall street 没上市的公司还灵活些 对patagonia大增 到个人层面 差不多就是growth mindset 有意思的是作者提到了他的worthy rival是adam grant 差距还是有些大的吧
评分##We should have the infinite mindset to live in the infinite game through our life. Same as the growth mindset .. As a leader in a company that needs a lot to learn...first thing to let your mindset on the track is right.
评分##商业，友谊，健康，孩子的抚养和成长，人生，这些是我们没有输赢但必须玩下去的无限游戏
评分##一般吧
评分##理念十分认同，不过有些比较熟悉的商业案例总结得过于简单了，反而让人会质疑其论点
评分##1、不管我们赚了多少钱，权力有多大，在生活这个游戏中，都不能说自己是个赢家，我们需要的是，一直在游戏中；2、一个无限思维的生活，就是过一个“服务”的生活；3、拥有无限思维的父母，应该发现孩子的特长，指出他们的爱好，并培养他们实现的勇气。
评分##We are all players of multiple infinite games of life. To serve is good for the game.
评分##公司townhall听到有人提这本书 好奇看完了 理念是好的 long term view, just cause, do the right thing怎么说都是对的 大公司里挑出来好例子做proof也不难 但mkt看重的performance efficiency 不是所有公司都有一样的机会convince wall street 没上市的公司还灵活些 对patagonia大增 到个人层面 差不多就是growth mindset 有意思的是作者提到了他的worthy rival是adam grant 差距还是有些大的吧
评分##Fulfill, not win. 从Designing your life过来的，那本书有一节就是让大家明白人生是无限游戏，而非互相攀比的有限游戏。这本书主要是以商业公司角度谈了无限游戏，穿插一些个人成长相关的内容（Sinek和Grant互相攀比真是笑死我）。 最受用的一段就是苹果大佬听说微软出了比iPod更好用的竞争品，淡淡地说“不错嘛”（真的不是品牌宣传吗？？）。这种“我在追求更长远的目标，所以现在落后于某个群体并非意料之外，也不会影响我的计划”的淡然，素晴素晴！ 关键词：worthy rival、just cause（积极支持、包容、长远、利他、理想主义）。 小问题：以品牌/CEO为单位分析有些过于非黑即白。而且听了黑天鹅以后，感觉很多（一切）因果关系的推断都站不住脚。。
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.tinynews.org All Rights Reserved. 静思书屋 版权所有