Software Engineering at Google pdf epub mobi txt 电子书下载 2025

简体网页||繁体网页

☆☆☆☆☆

Titus Winters

下载链接在页面底部

facebook linkedin mastodon messenger pinterest reddit telegram twitter viber vkontakte whatsapp 复制链接

承接住宅自建房室内改造装修设计免费咨询 QQ：624617358 一级注册建筑师亲自为您回答、经验丰富，价格亲民。无论项目大小，都全力服务。期待合作，欢迎咨询！QQ：624617358

想要找书就要到静思书屋

book.tinynews.org

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页

你会得到大惊喜!!

O'Reilly Media 2020-3-3 Paperback 9781492082798

具体描述

Titus Winters is a Senior Staff Software Engineer at Google, where he has worked since 2010. Today, he is the chair of the global subcommittee for the design of the C++ standard library. At Google, he is the library lead for Google’s C++ codebase: 250 million lines of code that will be edited by 12K distinct engineers in a month. For the last 7 years, Titus and his teams have been organizing, maintaining, and evolving the foundational components of Google’s C++ codebase using modern automation and tooling. Along the way he has started several Google projects that believed to be in the top 10 largest refactorings in human history. As a direct result of helping to build out refactoring tooling and automation, Titus has encountered first-hand a huge swath of the shortcuts that engineers and programmers may take to “just get something working”. That unique scale and perspective has informed all of his thinking on the care and feeding of software systems.

Tom Manshreck is a Staff Technical Writer within Software Engineering at Google since 2005, responsible for developing and maintaining many of Google's core programming guides in infrastructure and language. Since 2011, he has been a member of Google's C++ Library Team, developing Google's C++ documentation set, launching (with Titus Winters) Google's C++ training classes, and documenting Abseil, Google's open source C++ code. Tom holds a BS in Political Science and a BS in History from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Before Google, Tom worked as a Managing Editor at Pearson/Prentice Hall and various startups.

Hyrum K. Wright is a Staff Software Engineer at Google, where he has worked since 2012, mainly in the areas of large-scale maintenance of Google's C++ codebase. Hyrum has made more individual edits to Google's codebase than any other engineer in the history of the company. He is a member of the Apache Software and an occasional visiting faculty member at Carnegie Mellon University. Hyrum received a PhD in Software Engineering from the University of Texas at Austin, and also holds an MS from the University of Texas and a BS from Brigham Young University. He is an active speaker at conferences and contributor to the academic literature on software maintenance and evolution.

The approach to and understanding of software engineering at Google is unlike any other company. With this book, you’ll get a candid and insightful look at how software is constructed and maintained by some of the world’s leading practitioners.

Titus Winters, Tom Manshreck, and Hyrum K. Wright, software engineers and a technical writer at Google, reframe how software engineering is practiced and taught: from an emphasis on programming to an emphasis on software engineering, which roughly translates to programming over time.

You’ll learn:

Fundamental differences between software engineering and programming

How an organization effectively manages a living codebase and efficiently responds to inevitable change

Why culture (and recognizing it) is important, and how processes, practices, and tools come into play

用户评价

评分☆☆☆☆☆

##书中的很多最佳实践可能只适合 Google本身，但是 Google 如何摸索，沉淀这些最佳实践的历程的确值得每一家公司学习。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

##本来抱起这本书是想要学技术的，结果发现开头1/3在讲culture, 中间1/3讲process, 最后讲Tools，真的是很认真地掰碎了讲，不教你编程，而是传道受业。It seems a privilege to be a Software Engineer at Google :) 今天又是心甘情愿摸鱼搬砖的一天呢~

评分☆☆☆☆☆

##文化方面不看，工程方面（代码、文档、设计）可参考（清晰&逻辑是最终答案），管理和团队方面，印证了之前的观念

评分☆☆☆☆☆

##绝大部分都已经是行业规范了。但是能系统的解释一下理由，让大家做到知其所以然，还是挺好的。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

##这本书太牛了，而且恰好在我需要的时候遇见。最有收获的是前三部分，尤其是文档和测试。第四部分工具篇由于规模达不到，反而不是特别适用。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

##书中的很多最佳实践可能只适合 Google本身，但是 Google 如何摸索，沉淀这些最佳实践的历程的确值得每一家公司学习。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

##前半部分还挺真实的，后面的部分应该只适合google了，所有的决定都是trade-off。

评分☆☆☆☆☆